With Poland gearing up for the presidential elections set to begin on May 18, 2025, questions about foreign influence in its political processes are resurfacing. Among the most serious allegations are those claiming that Russian intelligence services funded illegal activities to interfere in Poland’s 2023 parliamentary elections. These accusations, backed by evidence from Polish authorities and debated both domestically and internationally, have reignited concerns about the security of Poland’s democracy. This article examines the nature of the alleged Russian interference, the evidence behind it, and how it is being interpreted in Poland and beyond, particularly as the country braces for another pivotal vote.
Claims of Russian Interference in 2023
Polish security officials have asserted that Russian intelligence services orchestrated a range of illicit operations ahead of the 2023 parliamentary elections. These efforts reportedly included funding disinformation campaigns, supporting provocative public actions, and even facilitating minor sabotage.
“Russian intelligence paid for the promotion of the slogan “F…k PiS”, as well as for attacks on President Andrzej Duda. And in 2023, Russia tried to compromise the previous government during the elections through a disinformation operation. It is worth drawing conclusions from this.”, said Stanisła Żaryn, advisor to the President of the Republic of Poland, former Government Plenipotentiary for Information Space Security of the Republic of Poland.
Rosyjski wywiad płacił za promowanie hasła „J…ć PiS”, a także za ataki na Prezydenta Andrzeja Dudę. A w 2023 roku Rosja w czasie wyborów próbowała skompromitować poprzedni rząd poprzez operację dezinformacyjną. Warto wyciągać z tego wnioski. https://t.co/uNLHSidHsG
— Stanisław Żaryn (@StZaryn) February 25, 2025
Sources suggest that Russian agents funneled money to individuals tasked with amplifying divisive narratives—such as anti-EU or anti-Ukrainian sentiments—to deepen societal rifts and influence voter sentiment. The goal, according to analysts, was to weaken Poland’s political stability at a time when its role as a staunch supporter of Ukraine made it a prime target for Russian disruption.
Evidence Behind the Allegations
The Polish Internal Security Agency (ABW) has pointed to concrete evidence, including financial transactions traced to Russian intermediaries and intercepted communications outlining operational plans. Publicly, officials have referenced specific incidents, such as payments to individuals who painted anti-government slogans or disrupted campaign events. Cybersecurity experts have also linked cyberattacks on election-related infrastructure to Russian state-sponsored groups. While some sensitive details remain under wraps, Poland’s claims have been bolstered by corroborating intelligence from NATO allies, lending weight to the narrative of a coordinated interference effort.
Poland’s Domestic Response
In Poland, the allegations have sparked a heated debate. Supporters of the former Law and Justice (PiS) government, which was in power during the 2023 elections, see the findings as validation of their warnings about Russian hostility, pushing for tougher security measures as the 2025 presidential race looms. Conversely, opposition voices and some commentators question the evidence’s robustness, suggesting it could be a political tool to rally nationalist sentiment or deflect from domestic issues. Social media platforms like X reveal a polarized public: some demand accountability, while others dismiss the claims as alarmist.
With the presidential election approaching, the government is under pressure to prove it can shield the democratic process.
International Perspectives
Globally, Poland’s situation is viewed as part of a broader pattern of Russian interference in Western democracies. From the U.S. elections in 2016 to Romania’s annulled 2024 presidential vote, the Kremlin’s playbook is well-documented. European and American analysts have expressed solidarity with Poland, with reports from 2024—such as those detailing the Russian-linked “Voice of Europe” propaganda network—reinforcing the plausibility of Warsaw’s claims. Ahead of May 2025, international observers warn that Poland remains a high-priority target, given its strategic position and vocal stance against Russia’s war in Ukraine. This has prompted calls for enhanced EU and NATO support to counter such threats.
The 2025 Presidential Election Context
As Poland prepares for its presidential elections, the shadow of 2023 looms large. The government has rolled out proactive measures, including increased monitoring of online platforms and infrastructure protection plans, to thwart potential interference. The stakes are elevated by Poland’s ongoing role in supporting Ukraine and its position as a frontline state in NATO’s eastern flank. A successful Russian operation could not only tip the election but also undermine Poland’s credibility as a democratic leader in the region. The coming months will test whether lessons from 2023 have fortified the country against such external pressures.
Continue reading below image.
The allegations that Russian services funded illegal activities before Poland’s 2023 parliamentary elections, supported by evidence and debated widely, highlight a persistent challenge to the nation’s sovereignty. As the May 18, 2025, presidential election nears, Poland finds itself at a crossroads, balancing domestic divisions with the need for international cooperation to safeguard its democracy. Whether these efforts will hold against potential Russian meddling remains uncertain, but the stakes—for Poland and its allies—could not be higher.
Russia’s Proven Interference not only in Poland
Russia’s influence on European Union (EU) countries has been a topic of growing concern, particularly since the escalation of tensions following the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
From energy dependencies to disinformation campaigns and political interference, Russia has employed a range of strategies to exert leverage over EU states. As the EU navigates its response—balancing sanctions, energy diversification, and support for Ukraine—this article explores how Russia impacts other EU nations, the mechanisms it uses, and the implications for European unity and security.
Energy as a Tool of Influence
Russia has long wielded its energy resources as a means to influence EU countries, particularly those heavily reliant on its gas and oil. Before 2022, nations like Germany, Italy, and Hungary imported significant portions of their energy from Russia, with pipelines like Nord Stream reinforcing this dependency. The invasion of Ukraine prompted a swift pivot, with the EU slashing Russian fossil fuel imports by over two-thirds by 2024. However, some countries, such as Hungary, continue to resist fully cutting ties, citing economic necessity. This energy leverage has historically allowed Russia to pressure EU states into more favorable political stances, though the bloc’s recent moves toward renewables and alternative suppliers signal a weakening of this grip.
Disinformation and Hybrid Warfare
Beyond energy, Russia has mastered hybrid tactics, including disinformation, to sow discord within the EU. State-backed media outlets and online campaigns have targeted countries like France, Germany, and Poland, amplifying populist narratives, anti-EU sentiment, and polarization. For example, ahead of elections, Russian-linked actors have been accused of spreading false narratives to undermine trust in democratic institutions. Cybersecurity experts have also documented cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, such as those in the Baltic states, attributed to Russian groups. These efforts aim to destabilize EU cohesion, exploiting internal divisions to weaken the bloc’s collective resolve.
Political Interference and Alliances
Russia has cultivated alliances with certain EU political figures and parties to advance its interests. In countries like Italy and Austria, far-right and populist movements have expressed pro-Russian views, often receiving indirect support through funding or favorable media coverage. The “Voice of Europe” scandal in 2024 exposed a Russian disinformation network influencing European Parliament members, highlighting the depth of this interference. Meanwhile, Hungary’s leadership under Viktor Orbán has consistently resisted EU sanctions on Russia, aligning with Moscow’s narrative on Ukraine. Such divisions complicate the EU’s ability to present a united front, giving Russia strategic footholds within the bloc.
Economic and Military Pressure Points
Economically, Russia’s influence extends through trade and investment, though sanctions have curtailed this significantly since 2022. Militarily, its actions—like troop buildups near the Baltic states or provocations in the Black Sea—keep eastern EU members like Poland and Romania on edge, pushing them to bolster NATO defenses. The ongoing war in Ukraine amplifies these pressures, as EU countries bordering Russia or Ukraine face refugee inflows and heightened security costs. This dual economic-military approach tests the resilience of both individual states and the EU as a whole.
The EU’s Response and Future Outlook
The EU has countered Russia’s influence with a multi-pronged strategy: imposing 16 sanction packages by early 2025, boosting military aid to Ukraine, and accelerating energy diversification. Initiatives like the Strategic Compass, adopted in 2022, aim to strengthen EU defense capabilities, while programs to combat disinformation have ramped up. However, challenges remain—internal disagreements, such as Hungary’s vetoes on aid packages, and the lingering economic ties of some states hinder a fully cohesive response. As Russia adapts its tactics, the EU’s ability to reduce its vulnerability will shape the continent’s stability in the years ahead.
Russia’s influence on EU countries is a complex web of energy dependence, disinformation, political meddling, and strategic pressure. While the bloc has made strides in resisting this sway—particularly since the Ukraine war began—disparities among member states continue to offer Moscow opportunities to exploit. Strengthening unity, diversifying resources, and countering hybrid threats will be critical for the EU to mitigate Russia’s impact and safeguard its democratic integrity moving forward.